Most Popular in Linux
-
[$] 4K-sector drives and Linux
-
DRI, BSD, and Linux
-
IO Data Licenses Microsoft's "Linux Patents"
-
[$] LCA: Static analysis with GCC plugins
-
GNU/Linux: Rebuttal: Linux on the desktop: Still not happening
-
[$] Open source and the Morevna project
-
Kicking the Tires on Your Next CMS
-
Distribution Release: Tiny Core Linux 2.1
-
Distribution Release: PCLinuxOS 2009.2
-
Using physical encrypted disk in a VMWare Server virtual machine?
What lightweight but powerful laptop should I buy?
Which light-weight yet powerful laptop should I buy? I like the Sony Vaio Z, followed by the MB Air and the Thinkpad X200. Am I missing any models? I'm looking to replace my current work laptop - I use it for web development, so I need to be able to run Apache, MySQL, PHP, and some other stuff. I also use Chrome pretty heavily, and of course I watch a DVD every now and then, play music, etc. I don't run an office suite or play any games.
I carry my laptop to and from work every day, and my current HP is pretty heavy, so I am looking to buy the lightest laptop possible that still has a real CPU (e.g. no Atom, ULV, etc). I don't want anything at all resembling a "netbook". What I'm not considering at the moment is price - I'm happy to pay extra for a nicer, lighter, laptop.
At the moment, the best option I could find is the Sony VAIO Z-series. It weighs 3.3 pounds, not the lightest on my list, but it has a nice CPU (a T9900 @ 3.06 GHz). The MB Air is 0.3lbs lighter, but the CPU clocks in at 2.13 GHz and as expected does slightly worse in benchmarks. The Z also has a higher-res screen. I use an additional external monitor, but it is a nice extra. The Lenovo Thinkpad X200 and X200s are lighter even than the MB Air, but have even smaller screens and slower CPUs.
(Note: I am aware of the Z's in-BIOS VT block. I have no problems with patching the BIOS to work around this. I don't consider it a downside.)
Additional details: I plan on running Linux, so gross Linux incompatibilities are a no-go, but I think I can handle anything merely pedestrian. Also, I plan on swapping out the HDD with an SSD some point in the future, so if that has any bearing on anything, I'd love to know. I'm still in the research phase for that.
In short: I want a light yet powerful high-quality workhorse laptop. The VAIO Z looks to be a good balance.
My question: Am I missing anything in my analysis? Do any of these laptops have any glaring flaws? Are there any other models that have solid build quality and similar or better specs?
Thanks!
I carry my laptop to and from work every day, and my current HP is pretty heavy, so I am looking to buy the lightest laptop possible that still has a real CPU (e.g. no Atom, ULV, etc). I don't want anything at all resembling a "netbook". What I'm not considering at the moment is price - I'm happy to pay extra for a nicer, lighter, laptop.
At the moment, the best option I could find is the Sony VAIO Z-series. It weighs 3.3 pounds, not the lightest on my list, but it has a nice CPU (a T9900 @ 3.06 GHz). The MB Air is 0.3lbs lighter, but the CPU clocks in at 2.13 GHz and as expected does slightly worse in benchmarks. The Z also has a higher-res screen. I use an additional external monitor, but it is a nice extra. The Lenovo Thinkpad X200 and X200s are lighter even than the MB Air, but have even smaller screens and slower CPUs.
(Note: I am aware of the Z's in-BIOS VT block. I have no problems with patching the BIOS to work around this. I don't consider it a downside.)
Additional details: I plan on running Linux, so gross Linux incompatibilities are a no-go, but I think I can handle anything merely pedestrian. Also, I plan on swapping out the HDD with an SSD some point in the future, so if that has any bearing on anything, I'd love to know. I'm still in the research phase for that.
In short: I want a light yet powerful high-quality workhorse laptop. The VAIO Z looks to be a good balance.
My question: Am I missing anything in my analysis? Do any of these laptops have any glaring flaws? Are there any other models that have solid build quality and similar or better specs?
Thanks!
More Stories in Ask Metafilter: Linux
- Help me understand Seadragon!
- An Asterisky Proposition
- I've been on a desert island of unix-a-likes. Help me work out my new windows laptop!
- What are the best open source cpanel alternatives?
- How to remove Dan's Guardian from an Eee PC?
- Help me switch to Ubuntu
- Robust Tablet PC - exists?
- Headless machine set up by brainless tech
- ASP .NET based CMS versus Drupal
- Flatbed scanners and dynamic range for sketching
Most Popular Stories
Yet Another Blurry and Fake iPhone 3G Summer 2009 Image (It's Iron Bar Time!)
A Hands On Look at Safari 4's (Crashy) Eye Candy
Verizon Viewing iPad as Opportunity to Push MiFi Service
Intel 'Gulftown' CPU announcement fuels rumors of new Mac Pro
iPhone Tweet Defense Slaughters Zombies With Witticisms [IPhone Apps]
Steve Jobs' Threatening Phone Call Revealed [Blockquote]
Black Swan brings Google Voice back to the iPhone without the App Store
[$] 4K-sector drives and Linux
swapon: Function not implemented
etc: The EFF has published the iPhone developer agreement. Many of the stipulations are not new to most of us, but the EFF offers a number of criticisms on the agreement's limitations.