Most Popular in Apple
-
A fix for those "Pairing Record Missing" errors
-
Mac Hey, Sailor! Collection Lipstick Swatches
-
Apple receives regulatory approval for solar farm in North Carolina
-
Woz hired as technical advisor on Jobs biopic
-
Being Open Could Close the Door on Android
-
Daily Update for May 18, 2012
-
How Much Is Zuckerberg Worth? [Live Infographic]
-
Sprint offers $100 trade-in credit for iPhones from competing carriers
-
Steve Jobs biopic to begin filming in garage where Apple was born
-
G5 Mac "Pro" (sic) receives Macquarium treatment
Considering Aperture for iOS

Gabe Glick over at Macstories has a proposal: Aperture for iOS. On the surface, it sounds like a pretty silly idea -- Apple's high end camera app is really made for a desktop environment, and with the hassle required to get high quality photos onto iOS devices, there really isn't a point bringing Aperture over to a platform like the iPad. But Glick, though he agrees with the naysayers to a certain extent, is willing to take the opposite position. He says that he thinks Aperture is coming to the iPad with the announcement (expected sometime this year) of the iPad 3.
So we'll let him make his case. He says the Retina Display is a big benefit, for photographers who really want to see their pictures close up and in full color. Of course, the iPad 2 doesn't have a Retina Display, but if the iPad 3 gets the same kind of high definition screen that the iPhone 4 already has, Aperture would be more likely. iCloud's photo stream would make it easy to get pictures on the mobile device, a better A6 processor would make editing RAW photos and other high end resolutions easier as well, and finally, Glick says that a "professional workhorse" app like Aperture shouldn't be automatically dismissed from the iPad. Most people would have said the same thing about iMovie and GarageBand on the iPad, and both of those have done quite well.
When you put it like that, well, sure. Obviously this is all just speculation -- we won't know that Apple is releasing an app like this until it's actually announced on stage. But I will say as well that I've been trying to make noise lately for a sort of "iCamera" -- a more professional DSLR camera made and produced by Apple -- and I've been answered most of the time with the suggestion that Apple is betting on the cameras in its mobile devices rather than a separate dedicated device. If that is true, then sure, why wouldn't we want to see better official tools to deal with photos than the current Camera app offers?
Considering Aperture for iOS originally appeared on TUAW - The Unofficial Apple Weblog on Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:30:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
More Stories in TUAW
- G-Technology G-Drive mobile: Rugged, pocket-sized, and fast
- MacStories looks at four years of the App Store
- Daily Update for May 18, 2012
- Motorola, RIM offer Apple a nano-SIM compromise
- Apple's iTunes Festival scheduled for September
- G5 Mac Pro receives Macquarium treatment
- G5 Mac "Pro" (sic) receives Macquarium treatment
- DropKey app encrypts Mac files, free through Sunday
- Apple assuming retail lease, plans to open new UK Apple Store
- Woz hired as technical advisor on Jobs biopic
Most Popular Stories
A fix for those "Pairing Record Missing" errors
Mac Hey, Sailor! Collection Lipstick Swatches
Apple receives regulatory approval for solar farm in North Carolina
Woz hired as technical advisor on Jobs biopic
Being Open Could Close the Door on Android
Daily Update for May 18, 2012
How Much Is Zuckerberg Worth? [Live Infographic]
Sprint offers $100 trade-in credit for iPhones from competing carriers
Steve Jobs biopic to begin filming in garage where Apple was born
G5 Mac "Pro" (sic) receives Macquarium treatment