Most Popular in Apple
-
A fix for those "Pairing Record Missing" errors
-
You're the Pundit: Does a 7" iPad make sense for the education market?
-
White MacBook reaches end of life, education sales to cease
-
Backdoor in TRENDnet IP Cameras Provide Real-Time Peeping Tom Paradise?
-
Anonymous Hacks Syrian President?s Email. The Password: 12345
-
25 Things You Can Remote Control With Your iPhone [Apple]
-
Scientists Invent Robot That Powers Itself By Eating Organic Matter, Then Pooping
-
Beauty Review: NEW Rimmel Wake Me Up Foundation
-
The Most Prolific Hacker on the Internet: A One-Handed Shadow
-
Adobe confirms: no Flash for Chrome on Android
How Apple's newest iPods prove (and disprove) that it learns from design mistakes
When Apple released the third-generation iPod shuffle in 2009, I saw it as a perfect example of the design hubris that many Apple detractors point to. From a usability perspective, there really wasn't anything wrong with the second-generation iPod shuffle -- it had a minimal number of buttons, true, but their functions were fairly obvious. In a textbook example of the emphasis of form over function, Apple's third-generation iPod shuffle removed all of the controls from the device itself and moved them to the headphones' inline remote. Not only was the remote far more complex to use than the old shuffle's simple buttons, it also meant that, if you wanted to use third-party headphones, you'd either have to give up all control over the iPod or shell out more money for an inline remote adapter. The third-gen iPod shuffle got savaged in reviews, and it deserved it.Apple's fourth-generation iPod shuffle mercifully brought the buttons back. Apple even lists "buttons" as a feature on its page for the iPod shuffle. In a rare departure from typical Apple design, the fourth-generation iPod shuffle is much larger than the third-gen; it's not that Apple can't make a music player the size of your thumbnail, but it seems like Apple realized that it shouldn't. So, the return of buttons to the iPod shuffle proves that Apple doesn't always emphasize form over function. Right?
Unfortunately, although the iPod shuffle proves that Apple is perfectly capable of learning from its design missteps, the new iPod nano and iPod touch both feature design compromises that are almost as boneheaded as the buttonless third-gen iPod shuffle. Click "Read More" to see the way these new iPods, nice as they are in some respects, are in other ways an example of a "one step forward, two steps back" design.
TUAWHow Apple's newest iPods prove (and disprove) that it learns from design mistakes originally appeared on The Unofficial Apple Weblog (TUAW) on Fri, 03 Sep 2010 13:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
More Stories in TUAW
- App usage doesn't drop during Super Bowl -- except during halftime
- Daily iPad App: Tweetbot emerges as a top Twitter client for the iPad
- You're the Pundit: Does a 7" iPad make sense for the education market?
- White MacBook reaches end of life, education sales to cease
- Apple resellers in Europe say inventory delays affecting business
- Siri may speak and understand Chinese, Japanese, and Russian by March
- TUAW TV Live: Looking at what's new in the Appleverse
- Apple stock gains nearly $100 since Steve's passing
- Daily Update for February 8, 2012
- Protests against iPhone factory conditions planned at Apple Stores
Most Popular Stories
A fix for those "Pairing Record Missing" errors
You're the Pundit: Does a 7" iPad make sense for the education market?
White MacBook reaches end of life, education sales to cease
Backdoor in TRENDnet IP Cameras Provide Real-Time Peeping Tom Paradise?
Anonymous Hacks Syrian President?s Email. The Password: 12345
25 Things You Can Remote Control With Your iPhone [Apple]
Scientists Invent Robot That Powers Itself By Eating Organic Matter, Then Pooping
HMC Commands
Server error: 501 #5.1.3 in UNIX
Beauty Review: NEW Rimmel Wake Me Up Foundation