Most Popular in Apple
-
Localized Flipboard Content guides available for UK, Ireland, Australia and Canada
-
A fix for those "Pairing Record Missing" errors
-
You're the Pundit: iPad 3
-
Apple removes standard Mac OS X 10.7.3 download due to bugs, offers combined download instead
-
MPAA Sues LimeWire Back From The Dead
-
AirServer Lets You Push Airplay Audio To Your Apple Computer [Video]
-
Dev Juice: How do I autocomplete in Xcode 4?
-
Snow Leopard's 35 New Desktop Pictures Feature Nature, Fine Art and… Graffiti?
-
Apple Really Listening to Their Consumer
-
Airlock automatically locks and unlocks your Mac using your iPhone or iPod touch
Are These the First Core i7 MacBook Pro Benchmarks?
There's a pretty gnarly GeekBench result running around which appears to be for a new model MacBook Pro—6,1 to be exact—running a crazyfast 2.66GHz Intel Core i7 620M, one of the Arrandale chips Intel announced at CES.
MacBook Pros are definitely in need of fresh guts, and the obvious choice for chips are from the fresh batch of Arrandale processors Intel announced last month. The Core i7 620M would definitely fit the bill—it's a fast dual-core chip, and its TDP is in line with what's in the currently shipping MBPs. The GeekBench score is 5260, which MacRumors notes handily bests the current-gen 2.6GHz MBPs, which typically hit around 3700-4000. Not answered by the Geekbench results is what's up with the MacBook Pro's graphics situation.
In case you're not familiar with the way model numbers work at Apple, like the MacBook Pro 6,1 here, the first number in the set designates a major revision, and the second number indicates a smaller subset—the first unibody MacBook Pros were 5,1 for instance. And it's not unheard of for new hardware to come with a slightly custom build of OS X, like the 10C3067 seen here.
Results posted to GeekBench aren't the most credible evidence of new, gutsier MacBook Pros for obvious reasons, but if even they aren't real, it seems safe to assume we're due for some fresh Core i7 silicon sometime soon. I hope so, anyway. [Geekbench via MacRumors - Thanks OberCFS and Jack!]
More Stories in Gizmodo Apple
- Apple's Recalled First Gen iPod Nanos Are Being Replaced With the Same Model
- How Do You Get a Million People to Buy a Gadget That Nobody's Even Used Yet?
- Apple TV Update Adds AirPlay Mirroring, NHL, WSJ
- How to Get Panning Shots With Your iPhone 4S (Hint: It Involves Cineskates)
- The 5 Weirdest iPod Nano Watch Faces
- The New iPod Nano's Got a New Apple Processor
- The New Fitness-Centric iPod Nano Doubles As a Watch
- Court Rules Galaxy Tab 7.7 Can't Even Be Shown on Germany's IFA Show Floor
- BGR: Best Buy Expects iPhone to Come On the First Week of October
- Could the iPhone 5 Be Smaller Than We Think?
Most Popular Stories
Localized Flipboard Content guides available for UK, Ireland, Australia and Canada
A fix for those "Pairing Record Missing" errors
You're the Pundit: iPad 3
Apple removes standard Mac OS X 10.7.3 download due to bugs, offers combined download instead
MPAA Sues LimeWire Back From The Dead
This forum's font looks bad on my new installation
Scripting Issue
need to know if there are ftp connections in my machine
AirServer Lets You Push Airplay Audio To Your Apple Computer [Video]
Dev Juice: How do I autocomplete in Xcode 4?